Friday, August 7, 2009

Twitter Tweety Killed, Facebook ripped and the Social Network Drowned

The two biggies of the Social Network seemed to cripple as both Twitter and Facebook faced outage of services which ultimately came up to be a DDoS attack from an unidentified source. The attack was carried out at some 10 AM Eastern Time. This attack also followed on other sites such as LiveJournal and recently Youtube is reported to have the same slowdown. Although Youtube has not stated any of its service down.

As on Twitter Status Blog, Twitter reported the problem while tweeters waited long to their favorite social network. The outage has been reported to be the longest stretching whole 2 hours which in Online terms is quite a long time!

The blogosphere and other social networks were filled with disappointed Tweeters reaching out for alternatives and with cries for the outage of the service.

Twitter then reported to be "defending against a Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) attack" that was causing the outage.

After it was over with Twitter came a news about Facebook facing the same problem. Worldwide Facebook returned Network errors with its service increasing the disappointment in people. After all we love to be socially connected of which facebook is an indispensable part.

After the Attack was succesfully defended, Facebook Officials stated the same outage to be a DDoS of which the source is still to be tracked.

But what caused this chaos in the Social Network world? Some blogs have reported the source of attack to be related to the Georgia Russia Crisis and that the attack was organized to silence one man reported to be "cyxymu" as on Twitter.

In an interview, Facebook's chief security officer Max Kelly told CNET.com, “It was a simultaneous attack across a number of properties targeting him to keep his voice from being heard. We’re actively investigating the source of the attacks and we hope to be able to find out the individuals involved in the back end and to take action against them if we can.”

Google is quoted as saying, “We are aware that a handful of non-Google sites were impacted by a DOS attack this morning, and are in contact with some affected companies to help investigate this attack. Google systems prevented substantive impact to our services.”

The claims back up earlier reports in the New York Times that Thursday’s attack was sparked by the conflict between Russia and Georgia. The aim was to take down Cyxymu’s accounts, particularly the LiveJournal blog where he posted about the crisis. While Google’s sites held up to the barrage, Twitter and LiveJournal proved less robust.

While DDoS attacks are notoriously hard to defend against, it’s clear that Twitter was far less equipped to cope with such an attack: no doubt they’ll be taking a closer look at how such issues could be handled in the future.

Another blog post also reported a leading security expert as stating that this attack was not a normal DDoS that we usually see with a botnet and malware and trojan infected computers supporting the attack. Rather this was an organized attack.
he security expert spoke with The New York Times and gave his assessment of the situation:

Bill Woodcock, a research director of the Packet Clearing House, a nonprofit technical organization that tracks Internet traffic, said Thursday’s attack was an extension of the conflict between Russia and Georgia. It was not clear who initiated the attack, he said, but likely “one side put up propaganda, the other side figured this out and is attacking them.”

Instead of using a botnet, or a network of thousands of malware-infected personal computers to flood a site with traffic, Mr. Woodcock said this particular attack consisted of a wave of spam e-mail messages, which began infiltrating Twitter and other sites at 10:25 a.m. Eastern time. “It’s a vast increase in traffic that creates the denial-of-service,” he said.

YouTube and LiveJournal were also affected, Mr. Woodcock said, although “Twitter was definitely hit the hardest.” YouTube said it had not noticed any problems with its service.

Reference from: Mashable

Whatever happened to the Social World has been a sort of security lessons to this network and if the attack was related to cyber warfare, then we could be seeing a lot more of this. Still, it’s tough to understand how these social media sites would be of any strategic value to either Russia or Georgia. Today’s events are certainly getting even more complicated, though.

August : The Month of the Meteors

Source: NASA News Service



A Perseid fireball photographed in 1997 by Rick Scott and Joe OrmanYes, it is true. According to NASA, August is the month of Meteors. This August is the Perseid Meteor Shower.

We'll get to see some Perseids all month long -- before and after midnight -- but the real fireworks will be going on the 12th of August, 2009 between (yawn!) 2 and 4 am (California) and 9-11 AM (GMT) while Indian people might be disappointed with the time for India corresponding to this will be 2:30-4:30 PM. Still, people can try to see it after dark on the 11th or 12th of August

Metoer showers are best seen in the hours after midnight. That's when Earth is facing the d direction in which the dust particles are colliding with our atmosphere.

As a bonus, two more planets will show up, one Venus as the brighter one and the other Mars as the red little faint one. NASA also says that even Neptune might be visible if you have a telescope.

If you've ever wondered about this cosmic firework, what makes up these beauties? Well, according to Jane Houston Jones of NASA's Jet Propulsion Lab, Meteor showers are just the debris of a passing comet or sometimes the debris from a fragmented asteroid.

When a comet nears the sun, its icy surface heats up. This causes clouds of gas, dirt and dust to be releases, forming a tail of debris that can stretch for millions of miles.

As Earth passes near the dusty tail, some of the dust particles hit our atmosphere. They burn up and create the celestial firworks we see.

NASA monitors these meteor showers to safeguard any launching or orbiting spacecraft.

The best part is You don't need any telescopes or binoculars to view these showers. Infact, these are better seen with naked eyes!

So, go out on your roofs and you won't be disapponted for stayin' up so late!

[Pic] Rollout of STS-128 "Discovery" By NASA amid Lightning



Rollout of space shuttle Discovery was slow-going due to the onset of lightning in the area of Launch Pad 39A at NASA's Kennedy Space Center in Florida.

First motion of the shuttle out of the Vehicle Assembly Building was at 2:07 a.m. Aug. 4. Discovery's 13-day flight will deliver a new crew member and 33,000 pounds of equipment to the International Space Station. The equipment includes science and storage racks, a freezer to store research samples, a new sleeping compartment and the COLBERT treadmill. Launch of Discovery on its STS-128 mission is targeted for late August.

Image Credit: Photo Courtesy of Justin Dernier

Thursday, August 6, 2009

Windows 7 Release Date cancelled? No way!

Reference : Blogs.ComputerWorld.com

Recent news showed up how Microsoft was shirked by a critical bug in Windows 7 regarding the chkdsk utility related to the chkdsk /r command.

The blogosphere was recently blabbering over the cancellation of the Windows 7 release date. The good news is : It ain't cancelled!

The bug reportedly overflowed the memory on execution in the Step 4 o its operation following a BSOD.
The bug was labeled as critical and a "show stopper" by the blogosphere as Microsoft has released the RTM code of Windows 7 to various OEM's and that it had to fix the problem as soon as possible.
But recent news has it that Microsoft has responded with "bug in Windows 7 capable of delaying the planned roll-out, which starts Thursday. The company has blamed a chip-set controller issue rather than a critical bug in the Windows 7 chkdsk /r tool."

Microsoft appeared to take particular issue, however, with descriptions of a "critical bug" and "showstopper" in Windows 7. ... "While we appreciate the drama of 'critical bug' and then the pickup of 'showstopper' that I’ve seen, we might take a step back and realize that this might not have that defcon level".

While the blog world has soon recognized that this may not be still a "show stopper" and that Microsoft might be able to prepare and send patch for the bug until the time that users might get a hand on the Windows 7.

Some forums have even reported that the bug news was a fake and that enthusiastic beta developers when tried to duplicate the problem by chkdsk /r tool, the problem didn't even show up!
So, that is really interesting when somebody shouts, "Hey, you've got a bug here. That's a serious problem coz you're ruined now!!!". Just when you know its fake.

In his blog, Richi Jennings reports all such instances in a timelined-story for you to read. Enjoy!

Sunday, August 2, 2009

What MS and Yahoo get out of the deal; And what advertisers and you could possibly get

Source: CNET News

Its time that everybody's been thinking why Microsoft and Yahoo have come up together with the deal between the two companies getting merged. Some have come up with the view that its an attempt to thwart off Google from its pre-dominant position in search market with MS doing the trick with its Bing Search Engine that was very well received from the consumer according to a report.

Here's an insight into what piece of pie does everyone get out of this delicacy:
Yahoo:
Yahoo is paying a 12 percent share for the outsourced search engine Bing from Microsoft, as MS pays Yahoo 88 per cent of the search revenue generated to it. Yahoo gets a guaranteed stream of search revenue for the next 18 months.
Plus, it gets to sell all the ads that are displayed on both Yahoo and Microsoft sites.
The new Yahoo CEO Tim Morse says that the company estimated that it will save $200 million in capital expenditures and see and overall benefit of $500 million in operating income.

What Yahoo gets low on the deal is the right to choose its destiny. The Search market of Yahoo is now in the hands of MS.

Microsoft:
The part of the good news for Microsoft is the ability to have a far more search market than it would have dreamt of acquiring. MS has almost tripled its search market with the merger. What's more is that all the Yahoo's tried-and-tested search tech and semantics is now available to MS.
And what's rumored is that MS would have to pay "boatloads of money" to get all this what it has got just in a merger rather than an acquisition of the Search Giant.
The part that's prickling is the relationship of MS from its advertisers that are now the "property" of Yahoo.

Google:
But what does Google get out of this? Does it get anything? Yes, Time. This deal as is said will take months, (if not years!) to complete and would be quite a deal to break.
Google Representatives likely called up their major clients to inform them of the uncertainty of this integration process and that they might be better of with a more stable operation.

Just what bitter truth for Google is that it cannot have the old British "Divide-and-Rule" strategy. Google was better off letting Yahoo and MS play like small kids trying to beat the "Daddy" of Search and compete between themselves as well. Now what happens? The two have a far more chance of making serious competition against Google when they're together as one. [The power of Unity!]
Google has more to live up to now!!!

Advertisers:
Advertisers now get a credible second option for their ad-spending as against the only other giant, Google, just about assuming that ad-spending ever becomes trendy again amidst the economic backdrop. They're also in store for a renewed pitch on the benefits of Internet display advertising, which probably still doesn't resonate on Madison Avenue but may one day start to make sense for the Internet advertiser.

But still, the relationships between advertisers and the two companies will grow more complicated as those used to working with certain representatives transfer their business to new faces. These may be resolved, but still are annoying.

Consumers:
For now, the only thing that consumers would get out of this is,

Yahoo Search Results:
Blah Blah Blah Blah
http://Blah Blah.co,m
"Powered by Bing"

What consumers lose out of this is the decrease in the available choices to them. This is not usually seen as good, but time will tell what's better.


Better still, Microsoft's got more market now so much so that it can force Google into playing defense while Yahoo gets to focus on more of its business.

Until then, its just not obvious!